Student’s Name:

Instructor:

Course Code:

Date:

BEST METHODS FOR PEACEFUL PROTEST

It is ethical to reprimand that; peaceful protest marks the nonviolence resistance in the real practice of forcing achievement of the goals like the social change which is achieved through symbolic protest and civil disobedience as well as political and civil noncooperation while being nonviolent. Markedly, it involves remonstration with the expression of bearing witness from the direct cause by either word as well as actions with regarding a specific particular situation, events or as well as the policies.

Moreover, protest can assume a diversity of forms, it can involve an individual’s speech to mass demos. The main objectives that are tied in these protest, it is to publicly making their preferred opinions to be heard in public in an experiment to influence either government policy or as well as public opinion (Flintoff 12). Importantly, the protesters may attempt a direct action to enforce their desires. Where these protesters are part of the systematic, maybe peaceful, nonviolent protest may help achieve a specific objective and always ensures utilization of pressure and persuasion. As a result of coercion and belief, the protesters go beyond protest and therefore, it is termed as the civil résistance.

Remarkably, the argumentation of the best methods for achieving peaceful demonstration as well as protest marks the cornerstone theme of discussion throughout the essay.

Boycotts mark a protest mechanism where the protesters tend to withdraw from a commercial or a social relation with either a state of an organization or as well a person as a punishment (Flintoff 41). Moreover, its diversity comprises of a punitive ban or as well as relation either with specific bodies as well as cooperation with some policies as well as handling of goods. In some cases, most of the boycotts involve voluntary and intention actions of absenteeism from either buying, using, involving with organizations, people or as well as the state for enforcing their desires. It is detailed to inflict some considerable disorientation of some economic gains or deviation of the economic target as a way of expressing the moral outrage which comprises of the compelling the organization or the body’s objectionable target (McCarthy & Bennett 26). Currently, the most common boycotts are focused on the long term changes of behavioral stuff, like the buying habits, and they are fit parts of the most significant political program which entails many techniques which are stricken towards longer structural commitments. They are reformed to moral purchasing of government commitments and commodity marketing.

During the civil right movements, one of the most common boycotts involves the Montgomery bus boycott. With such an example, Rosa parks denied giving a seat on a segregated bus. As a result of the denial, many of the Americans refused to travel by buses in the Montgomery. The bus system did not give enough revenue, and the long term effect was the desegregation on the buses which was an enormous success as a whole.

However, Rosa Parks are the most known for denying to give her sit, many others did it later. Claudette Colvin was almost fifteen years when she refused to provide her with sit as well to a white woman. Although she was dragged out of the bus, she put in handcuffs and sided with Rosa Parks that led him to do the same. All the same, Claudette ended up being amongst the four black prosecutors in the court of supreme that was responsible for the ultimate desegregation of Buses.

Civil disobedience leads as a significant peaceful form of protest in enacting the Protestant’s desires for communicating their wishes to a particular audience. It is the activism and as well as the professed refusal of the state comrades to adhere to some specific laws, for the demands or orders of the state that occupies the power. Civil disobedience is regarded as an expression of contempt for the law, but some veterans have their perspective towards civil disobedience. For instance, martin Luther Jr termed civil disobedience as a rematch and practical reference for a specific code (Omer 29). His perspective is concise in the sense that, anybody who attempts to break the law that conscience dictates to him that he is in just willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail in order  to raise the conscience of the protestants on the injustice of the law at that particular moment that expresses the highest respect for the law. There is a sense to which Martin Luther Jr is trying to implement but, most veterans agree it is the peaceful way of incrementing the government to pay attention to the attention of protesters in the correction of the preferred conditions.

Historically, civil disobedience was first successful in Britain when the bill of right of 1689 was documented. The last monarch of the Catholic was disposed of, after which the elevation of the male and female joint-co was achieved (McCarthy & Bennett 76). The civil disobedience was driven by the English Midland Enlightenment which was preserved as the illegitimate after taking the consequences of the law. It was then successful later, after which it became a useful, effective tool which was approached by the diversity of people to object the occupation of the British in1919 revolution.

Considerably, the major talks about civil disobedience involve the freedom riders. These riders would hop in cars which drop them to different places just to disobey the laws in a peaceful manner (Omer 73). However, most of the times, these protesters are beaten and majorly very badly injured in some places. For instance, the famous organizations like the SNCC and the CORE devoted their ultimate lives in in protesting peacefully. Civil disobedience still invokes the sit ins. Their core objective is breaking the law in a peaceful way. Many victims of the disobedience just wanted to raise awareness of the segregation issues, not only the white people were involved in these protest but also were African Americans.

A protest march is a demonstrative approach that diversely involves a group of people crowding and as well walking from an assembly point to some predetermined destinations. The protesters usually culminate in a political rallies an after which they evoke a parade or as well as a military march. These marches are actions by a proposed group of people in favor of a political or as well as other cause of people partaking in a protest against a certain cause of concern (Omer 52). Mostly, marches involves walking in formation mass marches and either beginning with or as well as crowding at a designated endpoint to listen to speakers. Historically, the majority of the civil rights movements was the marches. For instance, the major march that marks the history included the march of Selma. During this march, history has proven that 600 protesters started in Selma to march for their beliefs.it was captured on film when the police were ordered to attack the peaceful protesters. When the film was opened to the public, the majority were outraged and therefore it ended up helping the civil rights movement although the occasion is referred to like the bloody Sunday for its gruesome.

Sit ins involves demonstrations where people sit in the public place and they deny to move. It is the most tedious peaceful demonstration by the public. The best example to elaborate sit ins is the famous Greensboro boys that were Reverend Theodore Roosevelt Thopson. Thompson toured to Dallas lunch counter and sat there by himself. It is the best sit ins ever in history but the majority of the people were trained of the sit ins for the preparation necessary. All those veterans who tried the sit ins did not have it easy. Most of them were tormented, others harassed while others picked on as we’ll as others have food throne to them. It was difficult because they would remain calm and could not ravage so as to protect their peaceful protest being ruined (Spence 92). Considerably, these sit ins were very important as they laid a foundation for the development of the desegregation laws.

It is evident that peaceful demonstrations are not simple to enact in public. This is as a result of the diversity of torture from the hostility nature of the opponent that increments the Protestants to ruin their view of protest. In keeping a peaceful protest, the protestant has to humiliate the torture from the opponent that makes it a laborious process to humiliate. It is clear that the few individuals who have attempted the peaceful demonstration have encountered pain and most of them have lost their lives in the contempt.

References

Paul, Flintoff. How to Change the World. Picador Publishers, 2013.

Kelly, Spence. Martin Luther King Jr. and Peaceful Protest. Cavendish Square Publishing, 2016.

Haim, Omer. Non-Violent Resistance: A New Approach to Violent and Self-destructive Children. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Ronald, McCarthy & Brad, Bennett. Nonviolent Action: A Research Guide. Taylor & Francis, 1997.